Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
- topwater
- * Bateau Builder - Expert *
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:27 pm
- Location: Port Charlotte
- Location: Florida
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
Pretty sure it it helps keep glare off the windshield, especially at night.
Novi 23 finally launched !
-
- * Bateau Builder - Expert *
- Posts: 10203
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:25 am
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
...but the windage and lost cuddy space!
-
- Very Active Poster
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 11:58 pm
- Location: Western Canada
- Location: Ladysmith, BC
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
The big advantage in my experience is that it really clears the glass. You have gravity and wind working together to get the windshields clear so it's a good setup for rough weather.
If you look at boats with standard or reverse rake available, they usually share a deck, not a roofline, so there's no room lost. In fact, since radios etc often get mounted up top and are now foward and out of the way, the cabins sometimes feel a lot bigger.
If you look at boats with standard or reverse rake available, they usually share a deck, not a roofline, so there's no room lost. In fact, since radios etc often get mounted up top and are now foward and out of the way, the cabins sometimes feel a lot bigger.
-
- * Bateau Builder - Expert *
- Posts: 8938
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:23 am
- Location: Kasilof, Alaska
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
I have found I punch a lot fewer windows out with the reverse mounting. Not much sucks worse than driving with no windows in lumpy weather plus having all your electronics shorted out
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
Nope, not at all. I have obviously thought a lot about it, and may also have been blinded by all the large, flashy CC boats on shows like Florida Sportsman Project Dreamboat (more than just a little). Add to that a large serving of "the 3 foot disease" and the need to go bigger, badder and tougher than everyone else, and there's my boat project.
Realistically, what I need is an 18-22ft boat that will carry my family (2+2) and possibly another family of 2+2 safely, securely and as dry as possible for near-shore fishing trips, recreation and some light exploration.
So I bought an 18 ft boat with a 70 HP Johnson 2 months ago and splashed it this week.
a) I know! And despite being unemployed at the moment, I don't have any spare time whatsoever for some reason...BarraMan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 2:32 am Obviously I have no idea of your personal circumstances, but when I read,, I got to thinking!"I currently have a 15 foot open boat powered by a 30HP outboard"
The remarks below come with the best possible intent!
That is a BIG boat!
a) Its going to take a lot of build time.
b) Its going to require more than a few $$$ (or the Norwegian equivalent of) to complete and fit out.
c) Its going to need quite a few ponies to make it perform.
b) A while ago, while I was contemplating building a "stock" CS25, I did some rough calculations on the costs involved. I found a Norwegian supplier of marine plywood and other wood suitable for saltwater use. They also sell West System's epoxies and accessories, so I can get all my building supplies from one place, which will save a bit on shipping. In any case, just the hull will be around NOK160,000 (~USD20,000). That's just the plywood, epoxy and fibreglass required to build the hull, from what's listed on the study plans. Then there will be heaps more of everything for seats, console/pilothouse, fuel tank, electrics and electronics, fittings, paint and engine(s), etc etc. Peter had a single Evinrude E-Tec 300HP on his boat - those retail for NOK350,000 (~USD43,500) new, and I think I would like to get new motors for a project like this. And have them installed at the dealership's workshop.
c) If a single 300 drives a CS25 nicely, then with a CX30PH which will be longer, wider, taller and heavier, I should probably look at twin 250s or 300s. The price difference isn't that big between the 250s and 300s; the drawback is that we're looking at NOK600,000-700,000 (USD74,500-86,600) just for the motors. With inboard diesels we're looking at roughly the same cost. An interesing point however is that a Swedish company called OXE seems to finally have released their high-performance diesel outboards, so twin 300 diesel outboards could be a possibility. No clue what the cost would be, probably a bit lower, but all in all not that much of a difference to the bottom line. Which I guess will be somewhere around the NOK1.5M mark, if not closer to 2M.
The new-to-me 18ft with 70HP burns plenty already... Fuel (petrol) cost is also a big issue at USD7.50/gallon, so a build like this will probably leave me with a boat I can't afford to use...
As I wrote at the start, I have been thinking about this a lot, and lately I've been thinking that maybe a different type of boat is better suited to both my budget, time restraints and operations budget. I really like the CT22 Catamaran's size, though the interior needs to be rearranged a bit, and I would really like to have a windscreen and the possibility to at least pull up a canopy for when the weather inevitably changes. It's my understanding that a cat hull is easier driven and thus requires less motorage to achieve decent speeds. I'm not looking for race boat speeds in any case; the other day we were out in a slight chop and were cruising at 12-13 knots. I pulled it up to 20 for a short while, and the pounding was unbearable. The cat's hulls would reduce the pounding a lot, but still, top speed in the 25-30kn area is plenty.BarraMan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 16, 2018 2:32 am I think your planed build is going to require a lot more hp than mine, given that is 8+ ft longer and 2 ft wider. There are single O/B options up to at least 400 hp available now, and there is always the twin O/B option available.
My "other" boat is 12' long and powered by a 40 hp Yamaha 4-stroke. An average fishing trip cost me no more that $50 in fuel. My "new" boat costs me three times that in fuel for an average days fishing. I accept that for the comfort and options that a bigger boat allows.
If you have thought all these things through and are OK with them, then go-for-it, I say! I will follow your build with great interest.
But don't make the mistake of starting an ambitious build like this then bogging down and not finishing it, or building a boat that you find you can't afford to fully enjoy!
Cheers
Lee
I'll have to think a lot more about this for quite a while, but there will be a build. Some day.
8ft dinghy built in 1992, BBV sufferer ever since.
-
- * Bateau Builder - Expert *
- Posts: 10203
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:25 am
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
If fuel economy matters; the CS25 is not the boat.
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
That's my realization as well, but its lines are soooo seeexyyyy...
8ft dinghy built in 1992, BBV sufferer ever since.
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
It would be sexery if it was 27’!!!
-
- * Bateau Builder - Expert *
- Posts: 10203
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:25 am
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
Build the Skoota 24. Boat of a lifetime. You'll never sell her and if you can find an end slip you can keep her in the marina.
I like Merten's designs. A lot. I own LB26 plans.
But for you, the Skoota 24 will give you 4mpg or so at cruise.
I like Merten's designs. A lot. I own LB26 plans.
But for you, the Skoota 24 will give you 4mpg or so at cruise.
Re: Yet another "scaled CS25?" thread
That’s a nice boat but I need something that can fish Inland as well as offshore. In Louisiana one day we fish trout the next day tuna.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests