A) I've never been in a monohedral planing hull that didn't have a hump.
B) I've also never heard of a longer, proportionally narrower hull having a greater hump on the transition to plane than a shorter, fatter one.
C) If the DE25 is significantly different...why is the exact same verbiage used by the designer to describe it?
The 23 probably won't have a really harsh transition to planing but it won't be much different than the DE25. If anything it's probably a bit more of a hump, I'd guess. But it's probably hard to tell the difference from one to the other.
DE23 displacement speed
-
- Very Active Poster
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 11:58 pm
- Location: Western Canada
- Location: Ladysmith, BC
Re: DE23 displacement speed
Point B is what I thought toocracked_ribs wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 12:15 pm A) I've never been in a monohedral planing hull that didn't have a hump.
B) I've also never heard of a longer, proportionally narrower hull having a greater hump on the transition to plane than a shorter, fatter one.
C) If the DE25 is significantly different...why is the exact same verbiage used by the designer to describe it?
The 23 probably won't have a really harsh transition to planing but it won't be much different than the DE25. If anything it's probably a bit more of a hump, I'd guess. But it's probably hard to tell the difference from one to the other.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests